Understanding Vulnerability Scan Reports: How to Interpret and Act on Findings

Created by Peter Bassill, Modified on Thu, 20 Mar at 6:27 PM by Peter Bassill

A vulnerability scan report can be overwhelming, especially when it lists hundreds or even thousands of findings. However, knowing how to interpret and act on these results is crucial for effective vulnerability management. This article will guide you through the key components of a vulnerability scan report, explain the severity ratings, and provide advice on taking actionable steps to mitigate risks.


What Does a Vulnerability Scan Report Contain?

A typical vulnerability scan report includes several key sections that provide details on the identified vulnerabilities, affected systems, and remediation recommendations. While the format may vary depending on the tool used (e.g., Nessus, Qualys, OpenVAS), most reports include the following:

  1. Executive Summary:
    A high-level overview that summarises the number of vulnerabilities detected, their severity distribution (e.g., critical, high, medium, low), and key findings. This section is designed for senior management and stakeholders.

  2. Vulnerability Findings:
    A detailed list of vulnerabilities, including:

    • Vulnerability Name: The name or identifier, often referencing a CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) number.

    • Severity Level: Assigned based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).

    • Description: An explanation of the vulnerability, including how it can be exploited and its potential impact.

    • Affected Systems: A list of hosts or assets where the vulnerability was detected.

    • Remediation Recommendations: Suggested steps to mitigate or eliminate the vulnerability (e.g., applying a patch, reconfiguring settings).

  3. Technical Details:
    This section provides in-depth technical information for security and IT teams, such as scan parameters, attack vectors, and evidence collected during the scan.

  4. Appendices:
    Additional information, such as references to vulnerability databases, compliance mappings, and optional vulnerability exclusions, may be included here.


Understanding Severity Ratings

Vulnerabilities are typically categorised by severity to help organisations prioritise their response efforts. The most widely used system is the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS), which assigns scores from 0 to 10 based on multiple factors, including exploitability, impact, and the complexity of an attack.

Severity Levels:

  • Critical (9.0 – 10.0): Vulnerabilities that can result in full system compromise, often with minimal effort. These require immediate attention.

  • High (7.0 – 8.9): Significant vulnerabilities that could allow attackers to disrupt services or gain elevated access.

  • Medium (4.0 – 6.9): Moderately impactful vulnerabilities that require certain conditions or user interaction to exploit.

  • Low (0.1 – 3.9): Minor vulnerabilities with limited impact or low likelihood of exploitation.

  • Informational (0.0): Findings that may not represent vulnerabilities but provide helpful insights into system configuration or security posture.


Prioritising Vulnerabilities Based on Risk

Not all high or critical vulnerabilities require the same level of urgency. It's important to assess the context of each finding, including the following factors:

  1. Business Impact:
    How would exploiting this vulnerability affect critical business operations, sensitive data, or customer trust?

  2. Exposure:
    Is the affected system publicly accessible? External-facing vulnerabilities often pose a higher risk than those limited to internal networks.

  3. Exploit Availability:
    Are there known exploits in the wild for this vulnerability? If so, attackers may already be actively targeting it.

  4. Mitigation Measures:
    Are there existing security controls (e.g., firewalls, access restrictions) that reduce the likelihood of exploitation?


How to Act on Vulnerability Scan Findings

  1. Create a Remediation Plan:
    Based on the prioritisation process, develop a plan to address critical and high vulnerabilities first. Assign responsibilities to relevant teams and set deadlines for remediation.

  2. Apply Security Patches:
    For vulnerabilities related to outdated software, patching is often the most effective solution. Ensure that patch management processes are in place to minimise downtime and disruption.

  3. Reconfigure Security Settings:
    Some vulnerabilities can be mitigated through configuration changes, such as disabling unused services, enforcing strong encryption, or tightening access controls.

  4. Implement Temporary Mitigations:
    In cases where a patch is not available, consider temporary measures like network isolation, virtual patching, or disabling the affected functionality.

  5. Document and Track Progress:
    Maintain records of the vulnerabilities detected, remediation actions taken, and follow-up scans. This documentation is essential for audits, compliance reporting, and continuous improvement.


Rescanning and Validation

After remediation efforts are completed, it’s important to perform a follow-up scan to verify that the vulnerabilities have been resolved. This process helps ensure that no issues were missed or reintroduced.

Key Steps:

  • Run targeted scans on previously affected assets.

  • Compare the results with the original report to confirm remediation.

  • Update your vulnerability database to reflect the current state of your systems.


Improving Scan Report Accuracy

To reduce false positives and improve the accuracy of scan reports, consider the following best practices:

  • Customise Scan Policies: Adjust scan configurations to account for your environment’s unique needs.

  • Exclude Known Exceptions: If certain vulnerabilities are known and accepted risks, configure the scanner to exclude them from future reports.

  • Validate Findings: Conduct manual reviews of critical vulnerabilities to eliminate false positives.

  • Integrate with Security Tools: Use vulnerability data in conjunction with a Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) system to enhance threat detection.


Conclusion

Interpreting and acting on vulnerability scan reports is a critical component of cybersecurity operations. By understanding the key sections of the report, prioritising vulnerabilities based on risk, and implementing effective remediation strategies, organisations can significantly reduce their attack surface and improve overall security resilience. Regular rescans and continuous monitoring ensure that vulnerabilities are addressed promptly, keeping your systems secure in an ever-evolving threat landscape.

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article